Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class bbdb in /home/themes/public_html/forums/bb-includes/db-mysql.php on line 12

Strict Standards: Declaration of BB_Walker_Blank::start_lvl() should be compatible with BB_Walker::start_lvl($output) in /home/themes/public_html/forums/bb-includes/classes.php on line 1127

Strict Standards: Declaration of BB_Walker_Blank::end_lvl() should be compatible with BB_Walker::end_lvl($output) in /home/themes/public_html/forums/bb-includes/classes.php on line 1127

Strict Standards: Declaration of BB_Walker_Blank::start_el() should be compatible with BB_Walker::start_el($output) in /home/themes/public_html/forums/bb-includes/classes.php on line 1127

Strict Standards: Declaration of BB_Walker_Blank::end_el() should be compatible with BB_Walker::end_el($output) in /home/themes/public_html/forums/bb-includes/classes.php on line 1127

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/themes/public_html/forums/bb-includes/db-mysql.php:12) in /home/themes/public_html/forums/my-templates/kakumei-variant/rss2.php on line 1
ThemeShaper Forums Topic: Thinking 'bout the widgetized areas in the footer http://forums.themeshaper.com/ Help In Shaping WordPress Themes en Tue, 26 May 2015 09:43:02 +0000 amygail on "Thinking 'bout the widgetized areas in the footer" http://forums.themeshaper.com/topic/thinking-bout-the-widgetized-areas-in-the-footer#post-6945 Mon, 05 Oct 2009 20:22:10 +0000 amygail 6945@http://forums.themeshaper.com/ <p>Plan B makes sense to me - but I'm not using the hooks you asked about... </p> Chris on "Thinking 'bout the widgetized areas in the footer" http://forums.themeshaper.com/topic/thinking-bout-the-widgetized-areas-in-the-footer#post-6936 Mon, 05 Oct 2009 15:22:31 +0000 Chris 6936@http://forums.themeshaper.com/ <p>Hi,</p> <p>I'm thinking about the widgetized areas in the footer. To make these more flexible ( adding a fourth widgetized area) I need to do some changes.</p> <p>I need to know if anyone is using the following action hooks: thematic_before_first_sub(), thematic_between_firstsecond_sub(), thematic_between_secondthird_sub(), thematic_after_third_sub()</p> <p>We have two options:</p> <p>Plan A:<br /> I could keep all of them and give you the option to create a fourth widgetized area and so on (needs cascaded action hooks) </p> <p>Plan B:<br /> I could make a destructive change, reduce all these action hooks to a single one. In this case you would work with priorities to integrate additional functionality in front of / between / or after the widgetized areas.</p> <p>I know that we promised that all current or future changes will be non-destructive, but in certain cases this might not be the best solution for integrating something new. </p> <p>Currently I prefer Plan B .. I'd love to hear your opinion.</p> <p>Thanks!</p> <p>Chris </p>